Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28576 (RAJ)

PINKY KUMARI W/O RANJEET SINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/13066/2025 · 2025-09-01

Anand Sharma

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34903] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13066/2025 Pinky Kumari W/o Ranjeet Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Hantra, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Rajsamand. 4. The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Elementary Education, Rajsamand. 5. The Additional Director General Of Police Ats And Sog, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 6. The Additional Superintendent Of Police, Special Operations Group, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 01/09/2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition against letter dated 11.07.2025 sent by Additional Superintendent of Police, Special Operation Groups Rajasthan, Jodhpur to the S.H.O. Police Station, Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur with the direction to ensure presence of the petitioner with her Aadhaar Card, appointment letter and 4 passport size photos. [2025:RJ-JP:34903] (2 of 2) [CW-13066/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Teacher Grade-III in special abled person (HI) Category and even before appointment, she was subjected to medical examination through Medical Board yet, she is being harassed through the Police Authorities on the basis of alleged complaint raising doubt with regard to bona fides of her disability certificate. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the authorities for the purpose of her re-examination through Medical Board for which one general circular dated 28.08.2025 has also been issued by the Secretary, Department of Personnel. It is admitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that till date no coercive action on the basis of disability certificate of the petitioner has taken against the petitioner. 4. In the light of above, this Court deems it just and proper to direct the respondents No.2 & 4 to constitute the Medical Board for the purpose of examination of disability of the petitioner. Medical examination of the petitioner be conducted through Medical Board of either Sawai Man Singh Hospital (SMS) Jaipur or AIIMS, Jodhpur. Only after receiving report of Medical Board, any further action be taken against the petitioner in accordance with law. 5. Hence, writ petition stands disposed of. 6. It is made clear that no view has been expressed by this Court on merits of the case. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /23