Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28574 (CHH)

YUKESH KUMAR DHRUW v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5308/2025 · 2025-06-18

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:25629 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5027 of 2025 1 - Priyanka Rangari W/o Shri Umesh Kumar Rangari Aged About 33 Years Indu Chowk, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - District Education Officer Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 5308 of 2025 1 - Yukesh Kumar Dhruw D/o. Shri Chinta Ram Dhruw Aged About 32 Years Lecturer, Udt Govt. High School, Chawadi, Block - Charama, District - Kanker (C.G.) ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - District Education Officer Kanker, District - Kanker (C.G.) SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.06.19 18:58:36 +0530 2 --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 5268 of 2025 1 - Sangeeta Devi Sao W/o Shri Ram Kumar Sao Aged About 44 Years Teacher (Lb) Govt. Middle School Bapunagar, Khursipar Tah. And Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Governement Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan P.S. Rakhi New Raipur Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - District Education Officer Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Block Education Officer Dondi, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) WPS No. 5107 of 2025 1 - Usha Upadhyay W/o. Shri Sanjay Upadhyay Aged About 56 Years Assistant Teacher Govt. Primary School, Deovri, Block - Masturi, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - District Education Officer Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Suyashdhar Badgaiya, Dy. G. A. Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer 3 Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 19/06/2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioners are challenging the impugned transfer order and action of the respondents whereby the petitioners have been declared surplus Teacher and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents are against the rationalization instructions, and the same is arbitrary as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioners, and if the petitioners are not granted interim relief, they will suffer with irreparable loss. Therefore, the impugned order is liable to be set aside. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records, the petitioners have been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. Learned State counsel would further submit that if the petitioners are having any grievance, they may move fresh representation before the concerned District Rationalization Committee, and the Committee will take a decision on their representation in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioners are directed to make fresh representation before the 4 concerned District Rationalization Committee within a period of 05 days from today, and appear before the said Committee on 25th June, 2025. Thereafter, the Committee shall decide the representation of the petitioner within 07 days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law, in objective manner. Till decision on the representation is communicated to the petitioner, the impugned transfer order issued under Teacher Rationalization Instructions, so far as petitioner is concerned, be kept in abeyance. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika