IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 132 RSA-1922-1994 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.05.2025 SOM NATH ... Appellant V/S MUKESH RANI .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Avnish Mittal, Advocate for the respondent. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. As per office report, sole appellant has expired. 2. No one has appeared to pursue the appeal. 3. Dismissed in default for want of prosecution. 4. Liberty is, however, granted to revive the appeal, in case, anything survives for consideration. ( SUVIR SEHGAL ) 06.05.2025 JUDGE pooja saini Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Pooja Saini 2025.05.08 10:10 I attest the integrity and accuracy of this order/judgment