Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28568 (CAL)

SANTOSH KUMAR SINGH v. CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA AND ORS

WPA/14275/2021 · 2025-04-24

Ananya Bandyopadhyay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

N.22Sl 151/CL 24.04.25 Sl-14 Ct.33 (S.R.) WPA 14275 of 2021 Santosh Kumar Singh v. Central Bank of India & Ors. Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh … petitioner-in-person. Mr. Biishwambher Jha Mr. Harshwardhan Kumar Jha … for the respondents/Bank. The learned advocate representing the respondents/Bank is present. The petitioner appears in person and files a written submission, inter alia, stating that being incapacitated to bear the expenses to pursue the instant writ petition, he does not want to proceed any further and prays for withdrawal of the same. Let the written submission be kept on record. Under such circumstances, the instant writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)