Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28567 (ALL)

ANKIT PANDEY AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WTAX/909/2025 · 2025-03-10

Piyush Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35186 Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 909 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ankit Pandey And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Singh,Santosh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s) and Mr. B.K. Pandey, learned ACSC along with Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned ACSC for the State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. It is clarified that the dismissal of this writ petition will not affect the right of the petitioner to take recourse to the remedy available under the law. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 Amit Mishra Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad