Ankit Chauhan & ors. Vs. HPSEBL CWP No.16135 of 2024 10.1.2025 Present: Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ravinder Thakur, Advocate, for the respondent. Notice. Mr. Ravinder Thakur, Advocate, accept notice on behalf of the respondent. Reply, as prayed for, be filed within a period of eight weeks. List after pleadings are complete. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) M/s. Ajay Kumar Sood Vs State of H.P & ors. Ex.Pet. No.08 of 2021 10.1.2025 Present: Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Addl.A.G, for the respondents-State At the joint request of learned counsel for the parties, list on 25.2.2025. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) Sukh Dev Vs State of H.P & ors. CWP No.707 of 2025 10.1.2025 Present: Mr. Vinay Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Addl.A.G, for the respondents-State At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list in the month of March, 2025 to enable him to place on record the documents from which it can be inferred that he stands incapacitated on account of injuries suffered by him. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) Karamjeet Singh Vs State of H.P & ors. CWP No.851 of 2025 10.1.2025 Present: Mr. P.D. Nanda, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Addl.A.G, for the respondents-State In view of the fact that Annexure P-3 has not been challenged by the petitioner, at the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, case is ordered to be listed after six weeks. In the meanwhile, needful be done. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) Jaswant Singh Vs State of H.P & ors. CWP No.881 of 2025 10.1.2025 Present: Mr. Saurav Rattan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Addl.A.G, for respondents No.1 to 3- State CWP No.881 of 2025 & CMP No.1390/2025 Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3-State. Separate notice be issued to respondents No.4 and 5 returnable for 25.4.2025, on taking steps within one week. In the interregnum, respondents shall not engage any cook-cum-helper, i.e., the post against which the petitioner was working without the leave of the Court but the pendency of the petition shall not come in the way of the respondents in re-engaging the services of the petitioner. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) Dr. Sonika Vs State of H.P & ors. CWP No.15961 of 2024 10.1.2025 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Addl.A.G, for the respondents-State. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. In view of the fact that the petitioner is seeking quashing of notification dated 27.8.2017 by filing of this writ petition in the year 2024, this Court is of the considered view that the petition is grossly hit by delay and latches. To enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to address the Court on this issue, list the matter on 3.3.2025. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) Ashwani Kumar & ors. Vs State of H.P & ors. CMP No.1374 of 2025 in CWP No.7360 of 2024 10.1.2025 Present: Mr. V.B. Verma, Advocate, for the -petitioners- applicants. Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Addl.A.G, for the respondents/non- applicants. By way of this application, a prayer has been made for correction in the memo of parties. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the address of petitioner No.3 is wrongly mentioned and it would be in the interest of justice in case the application is allowed by permitting necessary correction and the corrected amended memo of parties is taken on record. This is a decided case. In view of the innocuous prayer made by the applicants, the same is allowed and the corrected memo of parties in which the correct particulars of petitioner No.3 are mentioned is ordered to be taken on record. Application stands disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) HPSEBL Vs HCL Infotech Ltd. CARBC No.4 of 2025 10.1.2025 Present: Ms. Sunita Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Dhananjay, Advocate, for the petitioner/non- applicant. Mr. Suneet Goel, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. vivek Negi, Advocate, for the respondent/applicant. By way of this application, the applicant has prayed for the release of the amount that has been deposited by the petitioner with the Registry of this Court. Learned Senior Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is willing to furnish bank guarantee to the satisfaction of the learned Registrar General equivalent to the amount to be released and therefore, the application be allowed and the amount be ordered to be released. The application is opposed by the learned Senior Counsel for the non-applicant, who submits that as there is merit in the petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and the Objection Petition is likely to succeed in all eventualities in case the amount is ordered to be released, it would be difficult for non- applicant to recover the same. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the averments made in the application as well as the reply, this Court is of the considered view that interest of justice would be served in case out of the deposited amount of approximating Rs.9,46,00,000/-, an amount of Rs. 5 crores is ordered to be released in favour of the applicant subject to the applicant furnishing bank guarantee of an equivalent amount. Ordered accordingly. The application is disposed of with a direction that let an amount of Rs.5 crores be released in favour of the applicant subject to the applicant furnishing bank guarantee of an equivalent amount to the satisfaction of and verification by the Learned Registrar General of H.P High Court within a period of four weeks from today. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) Raj Kumar Vs State of H.P & ors. CWP No.16145 of 2024 10.1.2025 Present: Mr. Hamender Singh Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Addl.A.G, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. D.S. Kainthla, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. D.S. Kainthla, Advocate, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2 and respondent No.3 respectively. Reply, as prayed for, be filed within a period of eight weeks. List after pleadings are complete. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) Dalel Singh Vs State of H.P & ors. CWP No.15657 of 2024 10.1.2025 Present: Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Addl.A.G, for the respondents-State Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents-State. Reply, as prayed for, be filed within a period of eight weeks. List after pleadings are complete. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) Vijay Kumar Vs State of H.P & ors. CWP No.15658 of 2024 10.1.2025 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, for the respondents. Notice. Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Reply, as prayed for, be filed within a period of eight weeks. List after pleadings are complete. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) Om Prakash Sharma Vs State of H.P & ors. CWP No.15659 of 2024 10.1.2025 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Addl.A.G, for the respondents-State Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of respondents-State. Reply, as prayed for, be filed within a period of eight weeks. List after pleadings are complete. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) Lekh Ram Vs HRTC & ors. CWP No.16007 of 2024 10.1.2025 Present: Mr. Parveen Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents. Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. D.S. Kainthla, Advocate, accept notice on behalf of respondents No.1 & 2 and respondent No.3 respectively. Reply, as prayed for, be filed within a period of eight weeks. List after pleadings are complete. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) Sangram Singh Vs State of H.P & ors. CWP No.16009 of 2024 10.1.2025 Present: Mr. Rajiv Rai, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Addl.A.G, for respondent No.1. Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.2. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list after ensuing winter vacations to enable him to assist the Court on the maintainability of the petition. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 10, 2025 (mamta) Dr. Esha Singh V. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.9395 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Kusum Chaudhary, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. M/s V.D. Khidtta and Nishant Khidtta, Advocates, for respondent No.5. Heard in part. List for continuation on 05.11.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Dr. Madan Shandil V. IGNOU & Ors. CWP No.8255 of 2020 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Narender Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.2. Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Sarthak Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Heard in part. List for continuation on 06.11.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Sunita V. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.4571 of 2020 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents. As prayed for, list on 12.11.2024 (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Babu Ram v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.3873 of 2021 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents. As prayed for, list on 21.11.2024 (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Badri Dass v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.6177 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Lakshay Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State. CMP No.12766 of 2024 & CWP No.6177 of 2024 This application is disposed of by ordering that the documents appended therewith are taken on record. Reply to the writ petition not filed. Learned Additional Advocate General prays for and is granted three weeks’ more time to file reply. List on 26.11.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Preeti Chauhan v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.12271 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Naveen Pathania, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4. Mr. Ashwani K. Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not pressing reliefs No.1 and 3 and he is restricting his writ petition only to relief No.2, i.e. the respondents may be directed to pay salary to the petitioner at par with the Accounts Officer being paid in the Department, on the principle of equal pay for equal work. Notice on the said relief. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Naveen Pathania, Advocate, accept notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and respondents No.2 to 4 respectively. Reply within a period of six weeks. List thereafter. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Jai Parkash v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.12205 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. Faced with the issue of delay and laches, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the case be taken up on 06.11.2024. Ordered accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Vandana Mehta v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.12207 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. Faced with the issue of delay and laches, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the case be taken up on 06.11.2024. Ordered accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Kumari Neelam v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.12208 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Mohit Thakur, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. Faced with the issue of delay and laches, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the case be taken up on 06.11.2024. Ordered accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Sanjeev Kumar v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.11706 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Lalit Kumar Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list on 05.11.2024, to enable him to have instructions in the matter. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Sumna Kumari v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.11731 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Lalit Kumar Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list on 05.11.2024, to enable him to have instructions in the matter. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Puneet Kamal v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.11705 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Lalit Kumar Sehgal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. On the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, list on 05.11.2024, to enable him to have instructions in the matter. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Dilip Singh v. M.C. Shimla CWP No.3959 of 2023 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. G.N. Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that sometime be granted to deposit the amount, in terms of order dated 04.09.2024. Let needful be done within a period of three weeks. List thereafter. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Kush Raj v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.5307 of 2023 04.11.2024 Present: Ms. Shivani, Advocate, vice Mr. Sunny Rawat, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. Fresh application, in terms of previous order, has not been filed. Let needful be done within a period of four weeks. List thereafter. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Manvi (minor) v. Accountant General (A&E) CWP No.8723 of 2023 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Arsh Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Somesh Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.2 and 3. Learned Additional Advocate General informs the Court that the case of the petitioner for the release of the family pension has been sent to the office of the Accountant General. Learned counsel for the Accountant General submits that sometime be granted to him to have instructions in the matter. List on 22.11.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Pawan Kumar v. HPNLU CWP No.9859 of 2023 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Sambhav Bhasin, Advocate, for the petitioner. Dr. Rajesh Kumar Parmar, Advocate, for the respondent. Notice in the matter was issued on 12.12.2023, since then, the reply to the petition has not been filed. On the request of learned counsel for the respondent, one week time is granted to do the needful. List on 13.11.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Pradeep Kumar Thakur & Ors. v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.9901 of 2023 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Shivom Vashista, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. On 16.09.2024, the following order was passed:- “Despite two opportunities having been granted, reply to the petition has not been filed. As a matter of indulgence, four weeks more time is granted to do the needful. In the event of reply not being filed within the said period, further opportunity will be subject to the payment of cost.” Today also, reply has not been filed. On the request of learned Additional Advocate General, three weeks’ time is granted to file reply subject to the payment of cost of Rs.5,000/-. The cost be recovered from the erring Officer and the same be deposited within a period of two weeks from today with the Bar Association, High Court of Himachal Pradesh. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Ram Lal v. HRTC & Anr. CWP No.10145 of 2023 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate for the respondents. Reply not filed. Learned counsel for the respondents prays for and is granted three weeks’ more time to file reply. List thereafter. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Kartar Chand v. Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. COPC No.22 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the Letters Patent Appeal has been ordered to be listed by the Hon’ble Division Bench on 13.11.2024. As prayed for, list on 25.11.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Sohan Lal Kaura v. Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. COPC No.46 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Dushyant Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that the Letters Patent Appeal has been ordered to be listed by the Hon’ble Division Bench on 13.11.2024. As prayed for, list on 25.11.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Surender Nikhil Gupta v. Sudha Devi & Ors. COPC No.148 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Shekhar Badola, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Learned Deputy Advocate General informs the Court that Letters Patent Appeal preferred by the State is listed before the Hon’ble Division Bench on 06.11.2024. As prayed for, list on 18.11.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Telu Ram & Ors. v. R.D. Nazeem & Ors. COPC No.159 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Neeraj Gupta, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Jeevan Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1, 2 and 4-State. Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Senior Panel Counsel, for respondent No.3. Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate, (through V.C.) with Ms. Rekha Bansal, Advocate, for respondent No.5. Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that he has received instructions from the Department, in terms whereof, there is a title dispute going on between some of the parties and, therefore, the compensation could not be released in the light of the said title dispute. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that the case be taken up after two weeks to enable him to go through the instructions. Ordered accordingly. List on 22.11.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Chanchla Devi v. Atul Kumar COPC No.630 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Learned Deputy Advocate General apprises the Court that the needful at the end of the respondent has already been done and now it is for the office of the Accountant General to take the subsequent steps. Learned Deputy Advocate General is impressed upon to ensure that the order is complied with by taking up the matter with the office of the learned Accountant General. List after three weeks. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Pradeep Singh & Ors. v. State of H.P. & Anr. CWP No.737 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Piyush Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Rejoinder stands filed. As prayed for, list after two weeks for consideration. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Neeraj Sharma v. UOI & Ors. CWP No.4633 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Abhimanyu Thakur, Advocate, vice Ms. Parul Negi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI, for respondent No.1. Mr. Rahul Mahajan, Advocate, for respondent No.2 and 3. Ms. Rekha Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.4. As prayed for, list on 05.11.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Nisha Kumari & Anr. v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.5591 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Mr. Sparsh Bhushan, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2-State. Mr. Pankaj Mehta, Advocate, for respondent No.3. As prayed for, list after three weeks. In the meanwhile, rejoinder to the reply as well as reply to the application by the respondents be filed. Interim order to continue. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Pooja Devi v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.9393 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Ms. Shikha Rajta, Advocate, vice Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3-State. None for respondent No.4. Respondent No.5 stands served. He is present in person in the Court and submits that he is adopting the reply filed by the State. His statement is taken on record On the request of learned Deputy Advocate General, list on 21.11.2024. Interim order to continue. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Vikas Sharma v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.9749 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Rajinder Kumar Sharma, Advocate, vice Mr. Ranjan Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3-State. Respondent No.4 stands served. As none has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No.4, he is ordered to be proceeded against ex parte. Learned Additional Advocate General prays for and is granted three weeks’ more time to file reply. List thereafter. Interim order to continue. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Vavita Devi v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.12251 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. CMP No.20196 of 2024 Notice in above terms. In the interregnum, the operation of office order dated 31.01.2023, (Annexure P-1) is hereby stayed and the respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to continue to serve against the post of Class-IV, till she attains the age of 60 years, in light of the judgment of Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2274 of 2021, titled as Satya Devi versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others and other connected matters, decided on 28.05.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Sushma Devi v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.12262 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. CMP No.20210 of 2024 Notice in above terms. In the interregnum, the operation of office order dated 30.09.2023, (Annexure P-2) is hereby stayed and the respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to continue to serve against the post of Class-IV, till she attains the age of 60 years, in light of the judgment of Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2274 of 2021, titled as Satya Devi versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others and other connected matters, decided on 28.05.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Asha Rani v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.12261 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. CMP No.20209 of 2024 Notice in above terms. In the interregnum, the operation of office order dated 30.05.2023, (Annexure P-1) is hereby stayed and the respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to continue to serve against the post of Class-IV, till she attains the age of 60 years, in light of the judgment of Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2274 of 2021, titled as Satya Devi versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others and other connected matters, decided on 28.05.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Raj Kumari v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.12260 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. CMP No.20211 of 2024 Notice in above terms. In the interregnum, the operation of office order dated 30.09.2023, (Annexure P-1) is hereby stayed and the respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to continue to serve against the post of Class-IV, till she attains the age of 60 years, in light of the judgment of Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2274 of 2021, titled as Satya Devi versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others and other connected matters, decided on 28.05.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Thakur Dass v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.12265 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Reply, if any, within a period of six weeks. List thereafter. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Anil Kumar v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.11707 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Ms. Reeta Hingmang, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents. On the request of learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioner, list on 11.11.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Dr. Pamil Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. CWP No.12297 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Dr. Lalit K. Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, for the respondents. Issue notice. Mr. Balram Sharma, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He prays for and is granted a week’s time to have instructions with regard to the impugned orders. List on 12.11.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Santosh Kumari v. State of H.P. & Ors. CWP No.12259 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State. Issue notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. CMP No.20208 of 2024 Notice in above terms. In the interregnum, the operation of office order dated 30.04.2024, (Annexure P-2) is hereby stayed and the respondents are directed to allow the petitioner to continue to serve against the post of Class-IV, till she attains the age of 60 years, in light of the judgment of Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in CWP No. 2274 of 2021, titled as Satya Devi versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others and other connected matters, decided on 28.05.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Meenakshi v. State of H.P. & Ors. a/w connected matters CWP No.2486 of 2023 a/w CWP No.2744 of 2022 & COPC No.193 of 2023 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Piyush Mehta, Advocate, for the petitioners, in all the petitions. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents-State. As prayed for, list after two weeks. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Rupali Sharma & Ors. v. State of H.P. & Anr. CWP No.9032 of 2023 a/w CWP No.9035 of 2023 04.11.2024 Present: Mr. Suneet Goel, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Vishwas Kaushal, Advocate, for the petitioner(s), in both the petitions. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for the respondents, in both the petitions. As prayed for, list on 05.11.2024. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod) Ranvir Singh v. Dr. Ashwani Kumar Sharma COPC No.469 of 2024 04.11.2024 Present: Ms. Babita Kumari, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Vandana Mishra, Advocate, for the respondent. Ms. Vandana Mishra, Advocate, submits that she has instructions to appear on behalf of the Board. On her request, list on 18.11.2024. Compliance affidavit in the meanwhile. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge November 04, 2024 (Vinod)