Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:34701] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14160/2019 Sangita Choudhary, Aged About 33 Years, C/o Harlal Choudhary, Shaid Bhagat Singh Colony, Shiv Bari Road, Bikaner (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Medical And Health Department, Jaipur.
2. National Health Mission, Mission Director, Directorate, Medical And Health Services, Jaipur.
3. Dr. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan Rajasthan Ayurved University, Kadwad, Nagaur Road, Jodhpur-342037. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishabh Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishesh Sharma Mr. Rahul Verma for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Mr. M.S. Raghav in SBCWP No. 14163/2019 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 29/08/2025
1. Heard on Application (I.A. No. 01/2023) with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, petition is being decided finally.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to order dated 21.08.2019, the petitioner initially participated in the counseling process of MD/MS course as in service candidate after and allotment of seat, he has undergone the required studies at National Institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur and has already completed his course. Thereafter even degree of MD/
[2025:RJ-JP:34701] (2 of 2) [CW-14160/2019] MS has also been awarded finally to the petitioner. He submits that in the light of subsequent facts, no more relief is required. However, the petitioner apprehends that the respondents may raise any objection with regard to conducting course without obtaining NOC.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondents have not disputed the fact that the petitioner has already completed MD/MS course and has already been awarded degree of the aforesaid course.
4. In view of above statements made by learned counsel, it would be in the interest of justice to dispose of the writ petition with the observation that the petitioner shall be entitled to take all the benefits out of his degree of MD/MS.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous in view of above directions.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/38