- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9631 WP No. 39661 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 39661 OF 2013 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SHAMANNA S/O MOODLAPPA., SINCE DECEASED BY LRs., 1(a) SMT. JAYAMMA, W/O SRI.SHAMANNA., AGED 80 YEARS, 1(b) SMT. PUTTAMMA., W/O SRI.BACHANNA, (PETITIONER’S ELDER BROTHER) AGED 83 YEARS, 1(c) SRI. NARAYANAPPA., S/O MUNIAPPA (ELDEST BROTHER OF THE PETITIONER) AGED 79 YEARS, ALL THE ABOVE ARE R/AT R/AT HUVINAYAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, BANGALORE NORTH (ADDL). TALUK BANGALORE URBAN-562 149. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.V.BHAT., ADVOCATE FOR LRs., OF DECEASED P1(a) TO P1(c)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMETN OF REVENUE MULTI STORIED BUILDING Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9631 WP No. 39661 of 2013 VIDHANA VEEDHI BANGALORE-560001 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT BANGALORE 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE 4. THE TAHSILDAR BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE 5. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, RASHTROTHANA PARISHAT BUILDING, NRUPATUNGA ROAD., BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SMT. B.P.RADHA., AGA FOR R-1 TO R-4; SRI. G.S.VINAYA KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R-5) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT ISSUED BY THE R-2 DATED.10.4.2013 VIDE ANNEXURE-L, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9631 WP No. 39661 of 2013 ORAL ORDER 1. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to an endorsement dated 10.04.2013 issued by the Deputy Commissioner in which he has stated that the request of the petitioner for restoration of the entries in his favour in respect of the land bearing Sy.No.106 measuring 4 acres 33 guntas, which had been classified as sarkari pada, cannot be considered, since the lands had already been acquired in favour of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB). 2. In my view, since it is not in dispute that the lands were acquired by the KIADB, obviously the question of revenue entries standing in the name of any person other than KIADB, as of now, will not arise. There is, thus, no infirmity in the order passed by the Special Deputy Commissioner and the Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:9631 WP No. 39661 of 2013 3. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43