- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24738 CRL.RP No. 826 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 826 OF 2017 BETWEEN: GANESH KUMAR S/O VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/A CHIKKTIMASANDRA VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT, WORKING AS CONSTABLE, RAILWAY STATE POLICE, BANGALORE CITY RAILWAY STATION, BANGALORE …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DILRAJ JUDE ROHIT SEQUEIRA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: HEMAVATHI W/O GANESH KUMAR R/AT NO.11, KAGALIPURA, NEAR FOREST OFFICE, KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE DISTRICT, BANGALORE – 560 061. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.K. LOKESHA, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24738 CRL.RP No. 826 of 2017 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 READ WITH 401 CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY IX ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN CRL.A. NO.41/2015 DATED 10.04.2017 AND ALSO THE ORDER PASSED BY THE II ADDITIONAL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN CRL.MISC.NO.22/2013 DATED 30.06.2015 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner was also absent on 02.07.2025. On that day, this Court has passed the following order: “Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. The matter is of the year 2017 and there are no grounds for adjournment. In order to give one more opportunity, the matter is being adjourned as last chance. Learned counsel for the petitioner does - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:24738 CRL.RP No. 826 of 2017 not argue on the next date, the matter will be dismissed. List this matter on 08.07.2025.” 3. Inspite of the said order, learned counsel for the petitioner is not present today to argue the matter. 4. It appears that, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this revision petition. Hence, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE KLV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34