APHC010406492025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 20913 OF ?09ii Between: Sompalli Rathnamma, W/o. Sompalli Govinda Rajulu, aged about 60 years R/o. 17-995, Venugopal Nagar, Ananthapur, Ananthapur Pradesh-515001 District, Andhra ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Municipal Administration A.P.Secretariat, Amaravathi. 2. Ananthapur Municipal Corporation Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh represented by its Principal Secretary and Urban Development, Rep by its Commissioner ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith India praying that in the the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents, more particularly the Respondent No.2, in trying to close the 33 feet wide CC Master Plan Road to the north of petitioner's subject property i.e. a plot admeasuring an extent of 0.35 cents Ananthapur District without following due procedure in Sy. No 176/3 of Ananthapur Town, and without considering the petitioner's representation dated 02.04.2025 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to the principles of natural justice besides being violative of articles 14, 21 and 300(A) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to not to close the 33 feet wide CC Master Plan Road to the north of petitioner's subject property and pass such other order or orders in the interest of Justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to not to close the 33 feet wide CC Master Plan Road to the north of petitioner’s subject property and to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 02.04.2025 and to pass such other order or orders in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KANDERI CHETHAN Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN DEV URBAN Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI P VENGALA REDDY (SC MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS) FOR The Court made the following order: APHC010406492025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 20913/2025 Between: 1.SOMPALLI RATHNAMMA, W/0. SOMPALLI GOVINDA RAJULU, VENUGOPAL ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/0. 17-995, NAGAR,ANANTHAPUR PRADESH -515001 ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ADMINISTRATION A.P.SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 2.ANANTHAPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ANANTAPUR, ANDHRA PRADESH ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KANDERI CHETHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 20913 of 2025 ORDER: Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved 1. by the inaction on part of the respondent No.2 in duly considering the representation of the petitioner dated 02.04.2025 whereby it was brought to the notice of respondent No.2 about alleged encroachment on to the 33 feet wide CC master plan road to the north of the petitioner’s property by third parties. 2. It is submitted that the roads are the property of respondent No.2 and it is the duty of respondent No.2 to protect them. In that regard, though a representation was submitted to respondent No.2, no action has been taken by respondent No.2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2. 3. 4. Considering the submissions, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage directing respondent No.2 to duly consider the representation of the petitioner dated 02.04.2025 and dispose the same by passing appropriate order within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. ‘ -* As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pendin|g^ if any, shall stand closed Sd/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Municipal Administration and Amaravathi. Ananthapur Municipal Corporation Urban Development, A.P.Secretariat 2. The Commissioner, Anantapur, Andhra Pradesh 3. One CC to Sri Kanderi Chethan, Advocate [OPUCJ 4. One CC to Sri P Vengala Reddy (SC Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Muncipal Admn Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies for Municipal Corporations), Urban Dev, High Court of Andhra TF i ' % HIGH COURT DATED:11/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 20913 OF 2025 DISPOSING OF THE W.P. AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION, WITHOUT COSTS