Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28526 (JHR)

MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./4057/2022 · 2025-09-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:27998] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI CrMP No. 4057 of 2022 1. Manoj Kumar Pandey, aged about 33 years, Son of Sri Hridya Nand Pandey, Male, by Occupation employed at WELLS FARGO COMPANY, Bengaluru as a Software Engineer, by Faith-Hindu, resident of Venkatamma Boy's Hostel, 12th Main, AK Colony, Bengaluru, P.O., P.S., Dist.- Bengaluru, Karnataka-560054, Aadhar No.722540789796, bearing mobile No.7619135570 2. Mina Devi, aged about 61 years Wife of Sh. Hridya Nand Pandey, Female, Occupation Housewife, Faith Hindu, Resident of Village- Sondhi, Post Office- Masudhi, Police Station- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur, Ara, Bihar -802158, Aadhar No.673971590144. 3. Chandani Kumari, aged about 26 years, Wife of Sh. Sunny Kumar, Female, Occupation- Housewife, Faith- Hindu, Resident of Village- Jamuaon, P.O. & P.S.- Bhojpur, District- Bhojpur, Ara, Bihar -802159, Aadhar No.259537223764, bearing mobile No.9121649743. 4. Manisha Kumari, aged about 29 years, Wife of Sh. Bittu Kumar Pandey, Female, Occupation-Housewife, Faith- Hindu, Resident of village-Sabalpur, Kotwapatti, P.O. & P.S.- District- Saran, Bihar 841211, Aadhar No.394772829525, bearing mobile No.7870731444. 5. Hridya Nand Pandey, aged about 57 years, Son of Late Sh. Ramdev Pandey, Male, Occupation-Retired Army Personnel, Faith- Hindu, Resident of Village- Sondhi, Post Office- Masudhi, Police Station- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur, Ara, Bihar - 802158, Aadhar No.845219914559, bearing mobile No.9547504964. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Supriya Kumari, aged about 32 years, , wife of Manoj Kumar Pandey, daughter of Sh. Lalan Prasad Singh, Resident of Yogiyara, P.S- Pratappur, District-Chatra, Jharkhand. … Opp. parties Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : None For the State : None 05 / 11.09.2025 No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 11.09.2025 Smita/-