Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28523 (JHR)

RAJENDRA YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./232/2025 · 2025-01-21

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 232 of 2025 1. Rajednra Yadav, aged about 54 years, S/o Runu Yadav, R/o At- Duna, PO & PS- Netarhat, District- Latehar, Jharkhand, 2. Danial Brijia, aged about 49 years, S/o Laguwa Brijiya, R/o At- Duna, PO & PS- Netarhat, District- Latehar, Jharkhand, 3. Rijwan Ansari aged about 53 years, S/o Sadik Ansari, R/o At- Pokhraha, PO & PS- Rajwadih, District- Palamau, Jharkhand, 4. Kayum Ansari, aged about 45 years, S/o Late Nanku Miyan @Nanka Miyan, R/o At- Duna, PO & PS- Netarhat, District- Latehar, Jharkhand … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kr. Singh , Adv. For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar , Addl.PP 02 / 21.01.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Netarhat P.S. Case No. 03 of 2024 registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners are the witnesses of the sale deed executed by the co-accused Saniullah in favour of Arun Kr. Gupta; even though Saniullah is not the owner of the land. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the purchaser has no grievance against the petitioners and there is no allegation of impersonation of the vendor of the sale deed. It is next submitted that the petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case, hence, the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioners shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JMFC, Latehar in connection with Netarhat P.S. Case No. 03 of 2024 subject to the condition that the petitioners will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-