[2025:RJ-JP:1584] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 335/2025 Rajkumar @ Raju S/o Totaram, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Babedi, P.S. Harsora, District Kotputli Behror. (At Present Confined In Sub-Jail Behror) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 10/01/2025 1. This second bail application has been filed by the accused- petitioner under Section 483 B.N.S.S., in connection with F.I.R. No.234/2021 registered at Police Station Harsora, District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 323, 341 & 307 of IPC. 2. The First Bail Application bearing No.16240/2024 was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 20.12.2024 with liberty to file fresh bail application after filing of the charge- sheet. 3. Heard. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar and also perused the charge-sheet. 5. The allegation levelled against the accused-petitioner is of causing a head injury on the person of injured- Ramdhan. As per the medical report, the injured- Ramdhan has sustained total five [2025:RJ-JP:1584] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-335/2025] injuries including two head injuries, out of which one has been opined to be simple in nature and other has been opined to be grievous in nature, however, the object by which the said injuries have been caused has not been mentioned in the MLR. 6. After going through the charge-sheet, it has also come out that the dispute between the complainant and the accused-party arose on the issue with regard to the boundary of the agricultural fields whereas the alleged incident has taken place all of a sudden. Since the injured- Ramdhan has sustained two head injuries; one is simple and other is grievous in nature and there is allegation against the accused-petitioner of causing single head injury on the person of injured- Ramdhan and in such circumstance, it cannot be said that whether the accused-petitioner had inflicted simple injury or the grievous injury on the head. 7. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the circumstances that is the dispute of agricultural fields which gives rise to the alleged incident and so also the fact that co-accused namely; Netram, Shersingh, Ramkaran, Harnarayan & Jagat Singh have already been enlarged on bail, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 8. This second bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before [2025:RJ-JP:1584] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-335/2025] that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J DIVYA SAINI /49