[2025:RJ-JP:34326] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12903/2025 Naresh Sharma S/o Ramesh Chandra Sharma, Aged About 47 Years, R/o 2/40, Rajasthan Housing Board, Gupteshwar Road, Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government Secretariat Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, Secondary Education (Headquarter), Dausa. 4. The District Election Officer (Collector), Dausa. 5. The Election Registration Officer (S.d.m.), Assembly Dausa, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 28/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by an order dated 22.07.2025 passed by a Single Bench of this Court at principal seat, Jodhpur in batch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12975/2025 : Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [2025:RJ-JP:34326] (2 of 2) [CW-12903/2025] 2. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be permitted to file a detailed representation before the competent authorities for redressal of his grievances. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation to the competent authorities of the department and the competent authorities of the department are directed to decide the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such representation; and if the case of the petitioner falls within the purview of the law laid down by this Court in the case of Ten Singh (supra); the same shall be decided in terms of the judgment above. 4. The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief sought. It is made clear that no view has been expressed by this Court on merits of the case. 5. Stay application and any other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/25