Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28519 (KAR)

SHUHEB S KHAN v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/6556/2024 · 2025-02-07

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5902 CRL.P No. 6556 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6556 OF 2024 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS) BETWEEN: 1. SHUHEB S KHAN S/O SHAHJAHAN KHAN AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, 2. SHAHJAHAN KHAN S/O ABDUL SUBHAN, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, 3. WAHEED KHAN S/O SHAHJAHAN KHAN AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 4. SHAHZIA ARIF KHAN W/O ARIF KHAN, D/O SHAHJAHAN KHAN, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT NO 01, SOUTH EXTENSION, SHIVARAM NAGAR, SUNGAM BYPASS, RAMANATHAPURAM, COIMBATORE, TAMIL NADU-641 045. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V LAKSHMI KANTHA RAO.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY EAST ZONE WOMEN P.S REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BANGALORE-560 001. Digitally signed by LEELAVATHI S R Location: High court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5902 CRL.P No. 6556 of 2024 2. SMT. AFSHAHED KHAN W/O SHUHEB S KHAN AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, R/AT NO 444, A, 6TH CROSS ROAD, HBR LAYOUT, 2ND BLOCK, BANGALORE-560 043. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. THEJESH, HCGP FOR R-1 SRI. HUSAIN MUEEN FAROOQ, ADVOCATE FOR R-2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR, COMPLIANT IN CR.NO.237/2023 OF RESPONDENT POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCE P/US/ 498-A,323,504,506 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AND SEC.3,4 OF DP ACT AS AGAINST THESE PETITIONER PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE VI ACMM, BENGALURU ANNEXURE A AND B. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that charge sheet in C.C.No.273/2023 had been filed on 28.05.2024 i.e., prior to filing of the present petition. 2. The said submission is placed on record. 3. The Petition is accordingly disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to file a fresh petition challenging the charge sheet. All rival contentions on all aspects of the matter are kept open and no opinion is expressed on the same. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BMC: List No.: 2 Sl No.: 44