Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28517 (CHH)

GANESH RAM PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5380/2025 · 2025-06-19

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:26479 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5380 of 2025 Ganesh Ram Patel S/o. Parikshit Patel Aged About 47 Years Posted As Lecturer (Mathematics) At Government Higher Secondary School Gorra, District - Raigarh (C.G.), R/o. House No. 02, Gajanand Puram Colony, Kotra Road, Raigarh (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Directorate Of Public Instructions (Dpi) Through Its Director, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Division Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Collector, Raigarh District - Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Raigarh, District - Raigarh (C.G.) ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms Anuja Sharma, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 20.06.2025 1. Heard. 2. At the outset, learned State counsel would submit on instructions that the representation submitted by the petitioner is allowed, and the concerned authority is going to issue necessary order within a short span of time. 3. In view of the submissions made by the learned State counsel, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he does not want to press this petition as the Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.06.23 14:23:30 +0530 Wps 5380 of 2025 2 representation submitted by the petitioner has already been considered by the authority concerned. However, he prays for liberty to challenge the impugned order, if any occasion arises. 4. On the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, present petition stands disposed of with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma