Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28514 (PNJ)

BHINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/11572/2024 · 2025-07-28

Sandeep Moudgil

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-11572-2024 DECIDED ON: 28.07.2025 BHINDER SINGH .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Rattu, DAG, Punjab. **** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondent No. 2 to arrest respondent No. 4 against whom arrest warrant has been issued by the CJM, Mansa in complaint case No. NACT/410/2019 U/s 138 of N.I. Act dated 22-10-2019 and further direct the Respondent no. 2 for taking appropriate legal action against the respondents No. 3 and 4. Learned State Counsel informs the Court that the complaint under Section 138 has been withdrawn by the complainant since he has received the settled amount, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. Anuradha 2025.08.21 21:56 I agree to specified portions of this document CRM-M-11572-2024 2 In light of the above submission, no cause of action survives in the present petition, hence, the same is hereby disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to take other legal remedy available as per law. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 28.07.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No Anuradha 2025.08.21 21:56 I agree to specified portions of this document