[104] Ravi Dutt Bani Singh and others Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] Counsel has produced copy of proceedings dated 17.04.2025, which shows that the appellant taken on record as Mark ‘X’. [2] the appellant. [3] 28.04.2025 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1506 Date of Decision : Ravi Dutt versus Bani Singh and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN None for the appellant. Mr. Satish Singla, AAG, Haryana. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) In compliance of order dated 20.03.2025, learned State Counsel has produced copy of proceedings dated 17.04.2025, which shows that the appellant-Vijay Laxmi stands served. en on record as Mark ‘X’. Despite service, no one has caused appearance on behalf of the appellant. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 28.04.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1506-1994 Date of Decision : 28.04.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN Satish Singla, AAG, Haryana. In compliance of order dated 20.03.2025, learned State Counsel has produced copy of proceedings dated 17.04.2025, which Vijay Laxmi stands served. Proceedings are Despite service, no one has caused appearance on behalf of prosecution. (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No In compliance of order dated 20.03.2025, learned State Counsel has produced copy of proceedings dated 17.04.2025, which Proceedings are Despite service, no one has caused appearance on behalf of RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.04.30 10:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document