Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2851 (AP)

BALA VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA v. VEGUNTA KRISHNA MOHAN

AS/69/2020 · 2025-07-15

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010008582020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 69/2020 Between: 1. BALA VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, S/O BUCHAIAH, HINDU, MALE, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/O MUDICHERLA VILLAGE, LINGAPALEM MANDAL, W.G. DIST. ...APPELLANT AND 1. VEGUNTA KRISHNA MOHAN, S/o Late Madhusudhana Rao Hindu, Male, Aged about 66 years, Business, R/o D.No. 22C-11-43, Chunduru Vari Veedhi, Power Pet, Eluru, W.G. Dist. ...RESPONDENT To set aside the Decree and Judgment dated 31.10.2019 dismissing O.S. No.180/2014 on the file of the Honourable Principal District Judges Court, W.G. District, Eluru and allow this appeal by decreeting the suit with costs al through and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant stay of operation of Decree and Judgment dated 31.10.2019 and passed in O.S. NO. 180/2014 on the file of Principal District Judges Court, W.G. Eluru as far as directing the petitioner to pay to the respondent a sum of Rs.86,985/- towards costs of the suit pending disposal of the above appeal in the ends of justice and pass. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. C VENKAIAH Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 69/2020 JUDGMENT: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J) Memo dated 14.07.2025 vide USR.No.71612 of 2025 was filed in the Registry by Sri Chalasani Venkaiah, learned counsel for the appellant for dismissal of the appeal as not pressed on the ground that both the parties have compromised and settled the matter out of Court. 2. Sri Y.Sitharam, learned counsel appears for learned counsel for the appellant that the Appeal Suit be dismissed as not pressed. 3. Recording the same, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as not pressed. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated:16.07.2025 AG 47 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 69/2020 Dated:16.07.2025 AG