M. NARENDRA KUMAR & ANOTHER v. THE A.P. SOURTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION CO. LTD., & 2 OTHERS
WP/9600/2007 · 2025-01-21
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28503 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28503 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010405492007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9600/2007 Between: M. Narendra Kumar & Another and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The A P Sourthern Power Distribution Co Ltd 2 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. N M KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V V SATISH (SC for APEPDCL)
2. K UDAYA SRI
The Court Made the Following Order:-
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief:
“to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action
2
of the respondents in not considering the case of the petitioners for appointment to the post of Contract Junior lineman along with others and not calling for the interview as highly illegal arbitrary and violative of Art 14 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the cases of the petitioners for appointment as Contract Junior Lineman by giving preference along with others without rejecting on the ground of higher qualification and pass...”
2. Smt. Meena, learned counsel representing Sri N.M.Krishnaiah learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication and the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
3. Ms. K.Adarshitha, learned Junior Standing Counsel for APEPDCL appearing on behalf of the respondents is present.
4. Recording the submission made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no orders as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J
21.01.2025. ASR
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO.9600 of 2007
21.01.2025
ASR