Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28502 (JHR)

RAM CHARAN SAO v. SUGIA DEVI

C.M.P./1236/2023 · 2025-08-29

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:26105 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 1236 of 2023 1. Ram Charan Sao, Aged about 64 years, 2. Laldeo Sao, Aged about 44 years, Sl. 1 and 2 are sons of late Jagdish Sao 3. Manoj Kumar Sao @ Manoj Saw, Aged about 36 years 4. Lal Kishun Sao, Aged about 33 years Sl. No.3 and 4 are sons of late Triloki Sao 5. Lal Mohan Sao, aged about 56 years, S/o late Rameshwar Sao R/o Pordey, panchayat sadamakala Petarwar, P.O. + P.S. – Peterwar District Bokaro All residents of village – Sadam, P.O. & P.S. Gomia, District – Bokaro, at present resident of village Tilaiya, P.O. Lalpania, P.S. Mahuwatand (O.P Lalpania), District - Bokaro … … Plaintiffs/Appellants/petitioners Versus Sugia Devi, wife of Kinu Gope, resident of village Sadam, Bhat Tola, P.O. & P.S. Gomia, District - Bokaro. … … defendant/respondent/Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Aditya Banerjee, Advocate For the Opp. Party : None --- 10/29.08.2025 This petition has been filed for restoration of S.A. No.208 of 2015, which stood dismissed on account of non-removal of defects in terms of order dated 04.02.2021. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioners has referred to the reasons mentioned from paragraph 12 onwards for non-compliance of the order. 3. In spite of service of notice, nobody has appeared on behalf of the opposite party to oppose the prayer. 4. Considering the submission and being satisfied with the cause shown, C.M.P. No.1236 of 2023 is allowed and S.A. No.208 of 2015 is restored to its original file. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Saurav/-