Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28499 (AP)

POCHULA SRINIVASA RAO v. INDUGULA GIRIJA KUMARI

CRP/2074/2025 · 2025-09-11

Ninala Jayasurya

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010405302025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2074/2025 Between: 1. POCHULA SRINIVASA RAO, S/O KUTUMBA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O KONDUKUDURU VILLAGE,LNAVALLI MANDAL DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. INDUGULA GIRIJA KUMARI, W/O.CHANDRASEKHARA RAO, AGED 70 YEARS, R/O D.NO.16-150/2/10, T.T.R.NAGAR, MUMMIDIVARAM MUMMIDIVARAM MANDAL, DR. B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 2. BOKKA VENKATA RAMA DEVI, W/O. VISHNU VEERA BRAHMAYYA, AGED 60 YEARS, R/O SANKARAGUDEM, H/O. KRAPA, DR.B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 3. BOKKA VISHNU VEERA BRAHMAYYA, S/O KRISHNAYYA, AGED 65 YEARS, HINDU, SANKARAGUDEM, H/O.KRAPA, DR.B.R.A.KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the order passed in I.A.No.740 of 2024 in O.S.No.79 of 2016 dated 17/07/2025 on the file of the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, Amalapuram in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders NJS,J C.R.P No.2074 of 2025 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in O.S.No.79 of 2016 on the file of the Hon'ble Senior Civil Judge, Amalapuram and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PONNADA SREE VYAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. NJS,J C.R.P No.2074 of 2025 3 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the subsequent developments the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the same, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:12.09.2025 Ksj