Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010256002025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3795/2025 SMTI PUTUL BHUMIJ WIFE OF LATE BRIJEN BHUMIJ, DAUGHTER OF LATE JUGAL TANTI, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT BASHBARI GAON, P.O.- HIJUGURI, P.S. AND DIST.- TINSUKIA, ASSAM PARMANENT RESIDENT OFUDALGURI TEA ESTATE, PURANA LINE, P..- PANITOLA, P.S.- CHABUA, DIST.- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM VERSUS ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT ORIENTAL HOUSE A/25/27 ASAF ALI ROAD, NEW DELHI 110002 AND REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI-7, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF REGIONAL MANAGER. 2:SRI RUP CHAND KARMAKAR SON OF RAM PRASAD KARMAKAR RESIDENT OF LINE NO. 7 MAKUM POST OFFICE POLICE STATION- MAKUM DISTRICT - TINSUKIA ASSAM 3:SRI ROSAN KARMAKAR SON OF LATE HARI CHAN KARMAKAR RESIDENT OF DINJAN TEA ESTATE PAKKA LINE P..- PANITOLA P.S AND DIST.- TINSUKIA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MS M G BISWAS, Advocate for the Respondent : MR SISHIR DUTTA, Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : MACApp./400/2025 ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT ORIENTAL HOUSE A-25/27 ASAF ALI ROAD NEW DELHI-110002 AND REGIONAL OFFICE AT GUWAHATI-7 REP. BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER. VERSUS SMTI PUTUL BHUMIJ AND ORS W/O. LT. BROJEN BHUMIJ D/O.LT. JUGAL TANTI PRESENTLY RESIDING AT BASHBARI GAON P/O. HIJUGURI P/S. AND DIST. TINSUKIA ASSAM PERMANENT RESIDENTOF UDALGURI TEA ESTATE PURANA LINE P/O. PANITOLA P/S. CHABUA DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR SISHIR DUTTA Advocate for : appearing for SMTI PUTUL BHUMIJ AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER Date : 23.02.2026 1. Heard Mr. S. Nath, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party No. 1. 2. This application has been filed by the applicant/respondent No. 1 in connection with MAC Appeal No. 400/2025 praying for an expeditious hearing of Page No.# 3/3 the connected appeal on the ground that the applicant is suffering from cancer. 3. The learned counsel for the Insurance Company does not oppose the prayer. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties as well as grounds stated in the interlocutory application, the prayer made therein is allowed. 5. Let the connected MAC Appeal No. 400/2025 be listed for hearing on 5th of March, 2026. 6. This interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant