Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28489 (KAR)

SRI BALJEET SINGH v. MR. RAJENDRA GOWDA

CCC/704/2023 · 2025-03-03

Krishna S Dixit, Ramachandra D Huddar

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8956-DB CCC No. 704 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 704 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SRI. BALJEET SINGH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O. LATE GURUCHARAN SINGH, NO. 106, DHEERAJ MANOR, 24 KENSINGTON ROAD, ULSOOR, BENGALURU 560 008 …COMPLAINANT (BY MS. YUKTHA N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MITHUN G A., AND SRI. V.D. SIDDAPPA, ADVOCATES) AND: MR. RAJENDRA GOWDA THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU 560 020 …ACCUSED (BY SRI. SACHIN B S.,ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SHAKAMBARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8956-DB CCC No. 704 of 2023 THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND RULE 5 OF THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS RULES, 1981, PRAYING TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCES COMMITTED BY THE ACCUSED/RESPONDENT NO.2, BY SECURING THE PRESENCE OF THE ACCUSED IN PERSON, WITHOUT COMPLYING WITH THE ORDER AND CAUSED BREACH AND VIOLATION OF THE ORDER DATED 09.10.2020 PASSED BY THE HON'BLE SINGLE JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT IN W.P.NO.35803/2016 (BDA), AND ALSO NON-FILING OF REVIEW PETITION SEEKING TO REVIEW OF THE SAID ORDER 0DATED 09.10.2020 IN W.P. NO.35803/2016 WITHOUT COMPLYING WITH ORDER IN W.A. NO.277/2021, WHICH IS PUNISHABLE UNDER SEC.11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT) We are told at the bar that the order whose violation is complained of, is put in challenge in writ appeal No.1731/2024 wherein service of notice has been made on the complainant herein. 2. Having regard to the very nature of the complaint and the pendency of the appeal against the order in question, we are of the considered view that for the time - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8956-DB CCC No. 704 of 2023 being nothing can be done in this contempt. Therefore, the contempt petition is disposed off. It is made clear that no interest in or right over the subject site in question shall be created in favour of any other person. This order is subject to the orders that may be made either interim or final in the writ appeal. Sd/- (KRISHNA S DIXIT) JUDGE Sd/- (RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR) JUDGE YN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10 CT:SNN