Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28488 (RAJ)

RAVINDRA S/O RAMPAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10779/2025 · 2025-09-24

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39547] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10779/2025 Ravindra S/o Rampal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Karadiya Handa, Police Station Atru, District Baran (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail, Baran). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Singh Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/09/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicant-accused Ravindra S/o Rampal seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No. 0213/2025 dated 12.06.2025 registered at P.S. Atru, District-Baran, for the offence under Sections 64(1), 351(3) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against him is complete and he is no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicant accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. The applicant does not have any criminal antecedents. He also submits that the [2025:RJ-JP:39547] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-10779/2025] applicant undertakes not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that complainant prosecutrix is an adult female and under pressure of her family registered a report after a delay. He further submitted that the statement of victim recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of BNSS indicate that she was a consensual party and kept relation as adult female person with present petitioner. He also referred medical and submitted that no injuries were found on body of victim. At last, he submitted that the petitioner accused is in custody since 15.07.2025 and charge-sheet is filed before the trial court. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. The complainant is already informed about filing of present case. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. On the basis of report lodged by 25 year old prosecutrix with her husband on 12.06.2025 about incident of rape on 04.06.2025, the matter is investigated. During investigation the statement of victim were recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of BNSS. The petitioner accused is arrested on 15.07.2025 and charge-sheet is filed against him. The statement of victim under Section 183 of BNSS indicate that her husband is employed by present petitioner accused but [2025:RJ-JP:39547] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-10779/2025] she is not aware about any financial transaction between her husband and present petitioner. 7. The order dated 01.08.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Atru indicate that complainant prosecutrix has filed an affidavit of compromise with petitioner accused. A copy of affidavit of prosecutrix indicating compromise is also placed on record which was executed on 24.07.2025 and notarised by notary public. 8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused 9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Ravindra S/o Rampal , is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. [2025:RJ-JP:39547] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-10779/2025] (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /143