- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19656 WP No. 16459 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.16459 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VIJAYA KUMARI W/O SRI KUMAR AGED 52 YEARS 2. SMT. ANJANAMMA W/O LATE ANJANAPPA AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NAGAMANGALA VILLAGE, HEGANAHALLI POST, KUNDANAHALLI HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562110. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. N. RAVINDRANATH KAMATH, SENIOR ADVOCATE A/W SRI. MOHAMMED ASHHAR C.K., & SRI NARASIMHA KUDUVA, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU-562110. Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19656 WP No. 16459 of 2025 2. THE TAHSILDAR, DEVAHALLI TALUK, DEVANAHALLI-562110. 3. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, KUNDANA HOBLI DIVISION DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562110. 4. DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK-562110. 5. VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT, HEGGANAHALLI CIRCLE, DEVAHANAHALLI HOBLI-562110. 6. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE VISHWANATHAPURA POLICE STATION BENGALURU-562110. 7. INSPECTOR OF POLICE VISHWANATHAPURA POLICE STATION DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU-562110. 8. SRI KIRAN, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN AGE : MAJOR NAGAMANGALA VILLAGE HEGGANAHALLI POST KUNDANA HOBLI DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL-562110. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SIDDHARTH BABURAO, AGA FOR R1 TO R7) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19656 WP No. 16459 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 & 2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER NO.1 DATED 31.05.2025 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-'A' AND 'A1' AND TO GIVE A FINDING WHICH WILL TAKE THE ISSUE TO ITS LOGICAL CONCLUSION; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO REFRAIN FROM TAKING ANY ACTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FORMATION OF THE ROAD ON THE PETITIONERS' PROPERTY, WITHOUT FOLLOWING THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Sri. Siddarth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 7. 2. In this writ petition, petitioners have sought for a direction to respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the representations made by the petitioners, dated 31.05.2025, as per Annexures - A and A1. 3. Heard Sri. N. Ravindranath Kamath, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri. Mohammed Ashhar C.K. and Sri. Narasimha Kuduva, learned counsel on record for the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19656 WP No. 16459 of 2025 petitioners and Sri. Siddarth Baburao, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondent Nos.1 to 7. 4. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners invited the attention of the Court to the photographs produced at Annexure-D and submitted that respondent - authorities have allowed for formation of a Layout which is illegal and therefore, sought for interference of this Court. 5. Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that disputed questions of fact are involved in this writ petition and therefore, sought for dismissal of the writ petition. 6. In the backdrop of submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and that the prayer made in the writ petition is to consider the representations at Annexures-A and A1, perusal of the writ papers would indicate that respondent No.1 has issued notice dated 20.10.2024(Annexure-E) to the petitioners stating that the said authority will take action in the matter under the provisions contained under Sections 39(ii) and 192A of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. It is also forthcoming from the writ - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:19656 WP No. 16459 of 2025 petition that the petitioners herein have filed reply to the said notice as per Annexure-E1 dated 02.11.2024. It is the submission of the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners that the said representation has been unattended to by respondent No.1 and therefore, sought for interference of this Court. 7. In the light of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, taking into consideration the grievance made by the petitioners with regard to claim in respect of the land in question, the respondent No.1 is directed to consider the reply dated 02.11.2024 (Annexure-E1) and the representation dated 31.05.2025 (Annexures-A and A1), within outer limit of four weeks from today. 8. It is also made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. 9. Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac