[2025:RJ-JP:35413] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10807/2025 1. Ramswaroop S/o Shri Prabhulal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o House No. 71-B, Near Ambika Avas Nagar, Police Station Borkheda, Kota City. 2. Mahaveer S/o Shri Prabhulal, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Nimoda Hariji, Police Station Digod, District Kota, Presently Ramprasad Meena Ke Makan Ke Kirayedar, Sarvoday Nagar, Police Station Borkheda, Kota. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10999/2025 Swami Singh Nayak S/o Shri Ramswaroop, Aged About 28 Years, R/o House No. 71-B, Near Ambika Avas Nahar, Police Station Borkheda, Kota City. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP and Mr. Om Prakash Pareek, Adv., for complainant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 03/09/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in [2025:RJ-JP:35413] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10807/2025] connection with FIR No.215/2025 registered at Police Station Borkhera, District Kota City for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110 and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that dispute has already been resolved by the parties amicably. He contends that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He further contends that the petitioners are in custody since 08.07.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned counsel for the complainant does not dispute the factum of compromise. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that dispute has been resolved by the parties amicably; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Ramswaroop S/o Shri Prabhulal, 2. Mahaveer S/o Shri Prabhulal, and 3. Swami Singh Nayak S/o Shri Ramswaroop shall be released on bail [2025:RJ-JP:35413] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10807/2025] provided, each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made herein above is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/261-262