Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28475 (AP)

NANDYALA VENKATRAVAMMA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/20926/2025 · 2025-08-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010404402025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 20926/2025 Between: NANDYALA VENKATRAVAMMA, W/o. SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O. JAMMALAMADAKA VILLAGE, MACHERLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT AT NARASARAOPET. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GURAZALA DIVISION, GURAZALA, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MACHERLA TOWN POLICE STATION, MACHERLA, PALNADU DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER RURAL, MACHERLA RURAL POLICE STATION, MACHERLA, PALNADU DISTRICT. 6. NANDYALA SRINIVASA REDDY, S/O VENKATESWARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS BUSINESS AND POLITICAL LEADER, R/O JULAKALLU VILLAGE, PIDUGURALLA MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th and 5th respondents in not executing the Non-Bailable Warrants against the 6th respondent herein in pursuance of the orders dt. 07-05-2025 made in M.C.No. 12/2015 and D.V.C.No.10/2015 on the file of the court of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Macherla, Guntur district is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principals of natural justice and consequently direct the 4th and 5th respondents to execute the NBWs pending against the 6th respondent herein forthwith.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for Home would submit that the Police are making efforts to execute the NBWs issued against Respondent No.6. 3. Sri G.V.S.Mehar Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed to execute the NBWs as directed by the learned trial Judge. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:11.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20926 of 2025 Dt.11.08.2025 Dinesh