RAJENDRA SINGH GURJAR, S/O SHRI SWAROOP SINGH GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/12667/2025 · 2025-08-22
Maneesh Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28465 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28465 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:33277] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12667/2025 Rajendra Singh Gurjar, S/o Shri Swaroop Singh Gurjar, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Village Kandroli, Post Shanti Nagar Sri Ma- haveerji, District Karauli. Presently Working As Senior Teacher (English) In Shaheed Inspector Hanumant Singh Government Senior Secondary School, Akbarpur, District Karauli ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Collector Cum District Election Officer, Karauli, District Karauli
2. The Electoral Registration Officer (Sdm), Hindaun, District Karauli.
3. Principal, Shaheed Inspector Hanumant Singh Govern- ment Senior Secondary School, Akbarpur, District Karauli ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 22/08/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present case is squarely covered by an
order dated 22.07.2025 passed by a Single Bench of this Court at principal seat, Jodhpur in batch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12975/2025 : Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
2.
Learned counsel, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be permitted to file a detailed representation before the competent authorities for redressal of his grievance(s).
[2025:RJ-JP:33277] (2 of 2) [CW-12667/2025]
3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation to the competent authorities of the department and the competent authorities of the department are directed to decide the same within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of such representation; and if the case of the petitioner falls within the purview of the law laid down by this Court in the case of Ten Singh (supra); the same shall be decided in terms of the
judgment above.
4. The order has been passed based on the submissions made in the petition, the respondents would be free to examine the veracity of the submissions made in the petition and only in case, the averments made therein are found to be correct, the petitioner would be entitled to the relief sought.
5. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/21