1 2025:CGHC:29806 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5955 of 2025 1 - Bijay Kumar Khare S/o Late Jagdamba Prasad Khare Aged About 53 Years Posted As Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Middle School, Parasgadi, Block Manendragarh, District M-C-B. C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Collector District M.C.B., C.G. 3 - District Education Officer District M.C.B., C.G. 4 - Block Education Officer Block Manendragarh, District M.C.B., C.G. 5 - Suresh Ram Bhagat Teacher, Govt. Middle School, Parasgadi, Block Manendragarh, District M-C-B. C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate. For State : Ms. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer. Hon ’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 02.07.2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner(s) is/are challenging the impugned transfer order and action of the respondents whereby the petitioner(s) have been declared surplus Teacher and consequently transferred under the Teacher Rationalization Instructions. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) would submit that the petitioner has not joined at the transferred place. The list of surplus Teachers published by the respondents is against the rationalization instructions and the same is arbitrary 2 as no proper opportunity of hearing was given to the petitioner(s) and if the petitioner(s) are not granted interim relief, they will suffer with irreparable loss. The petitioner(s) still want to pursue their representation before the concerned authority to redress their grievance. 3. Learned counsel for the State would submit that after due verification of records the petitioner(s) have been transferred under the rationalization instructions issued by the State Government. He would further submit that if the petitioner(s) are having any grievance, they may move fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee and the Committee will take a decision on their representation in accordance with law within a stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the pleadings and documents. 5. In view of submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner(s) are directed to make fresh representation before the concerned District/Divisional Rationalization Committee within a period of five days from today and thereafter the Committee shall decide the same within a further period of five days from the date of receipt of representation in accordance with law in objective manner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder