APHC010404382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 20660/2025 Between: 1. GUNNURI NAGA TEJASWINI, W/O GUNNURI ASHOK, (MAN MISSING)AGED ABOUT OCC- HOUSEWIFE, R/O. 10-383, BHAVANIPURAM, KONTHAMURU30 YEARS RAJAHMUNDRY, RURAL, VTC KOLAMURU SUB DISTRICT FOR NEW VTC, DISTRICT, EAST GODAVARI. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE R, AJAHMUNDRY EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NORTH ZONE RAJAHMUNDRY EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAJANAGARAM POLICE STATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order, or direction, more particularly one in 2 the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus, declaring the action of Respondent No.3 and 4 whose name Gounuri Ashok (Man missing) S/o. Gunnuri Nagaiah Aged about 35 years,Occ- Business R/o. 10-383, Bhavanipuram Kothmuru Rajahmundiy, Rural , VTC Kolamuru Sub District for new VTC, District, East Godavari was detained for the past 13 days without the registration of any crime of any reason of justification without any authority of law the said actions are arbitrary, illegal and violative of articles 14,19,21 and 22 of the constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to 4 Police authorities to produce the detenue before this Honble Court forthwith and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAJESH KUMAR B Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL 3 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the detenue has been released and subsequently, this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J. _________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J. Date: 06.08.2025 BSM 4 HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION No.20660 of 2025 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) Date: 06.08.2025 BSM