Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2845 (UTT)

BHUPENDRA BHAISORA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/245/2016 · 2025-05-05

Ashish Naithani, Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:3420-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL HON’BLE MR. MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI, J. HON’BLE MR. ASHISH NAITHANI, J WRIT PETITION (S/B) No.245 of 2016 Bhupendra Bhaisora …Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand & others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner Counsel for State : None present Mr. Sudheer Kumar Nainwal, learned Standing Counsel. JUDGMENT : (PER HON’BLE MR. MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI. J) Petitioner was appointed as Manager Technical in Disaster Mitigation and Management Centre on contract with effect from 16.11.2005. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought a direction to the competent authority to consider his claim for regularization on the basis of Regularization Rules applicable to the state employees. 2. It is not in dispute that State Government has framed Rules for regularization of contract/adhoc/daily wages employees in the year 2013. As per those Rules, anyone who was appointed on contract/adhoc/daily wages basis has a right to be considered for regularization, against available vacancies. 3. Since petitioner was appointed in the year 2005, therefore, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the competent authority i.e. respondent no.2, 1 2025:UHC:3420-DB to refer petitioner’s case for regularization to the Regularization Committee, and pass necessary order as per provisions of the regularization Rules within six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. MANOJ KUMAR TIWARI. J. ASHISH NAITHANI, J. Dt:05th May, 2025 NR/ 2