Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2845 (ALL)

NARENDRA KUMAR SHARMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/35701/2025 · 2026-05-04

Kunal Ravi Singh, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35701 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Harsh Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Nitish Kumar Singh holding brief of Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.2 and Sri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners on the instructions submits that no cause of action survives, therefore, the instant writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the same. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. May 5, 2026 Priya Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gajala Srivastava, Harsh Srivastava, Manish Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ishwar Kumar Upadhyay, Manoj Kumar Singh (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Narendra Kumar Sharma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRIYA KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad