IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.10303 of 2025 Mohammad Mustakim Raza …. Petitioner Mr. S.B. Mohanty, Advocate -versus- Chief Vigilance Officer, Vigilance Department, Mumbai and others …. Opp. Parties Mr. S.K. Swain, AGA (for O.P. nos.4 and 5) CORAM: JUSTICE M.S. SAHOO Order No. ORDER 17.04.2025 (Hybrid Mode) 01. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has made written complaint dated 11.10.2024 to the opposite party no.3-Branch Manager, Odisha State Bar Council Branch, Union Bank of India, Chandini Chowk, Cuttack. However, the petitioner has not disclosed how such complaint was made in which mode, it was served. It is submitted that another complaint dated 08.01.2025 has been made to opposite party no.1, copy of which has been enclosed to the writ petition marked as Annexure-11. Though the learned counsel refers to paragraph-12 and 13 of the writ petition regarding making of such complaint the avermants do not disclose that such representations have Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOSTNARANI MAJHEE Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 21-Apr-2025 18:32:15 Signature Not Verified been forwarded to by any means to the opposite parties 1 and 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner shall forward the representations as enclosed to the writ petition marked as Annexures-10 and 11 to the opposite party nos.3 and 1 respectively by post and the writ petition may be disposed of for the present. 2. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of . The petitioner shall find his remedy. (M.S. Sahoo) Judge jyostna