RONNY THOUNAOJAM v. BABY GIRIJA THOUNAOJAM AND ANOTHER
MC(RP(FAM.CT))/2/2025 · 2025-10-12
Ahanthem Bimol Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2844 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2844 (MAN) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page 1
Item Nos. 48 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR AT IMPHAL
MC(RP(FAM.CT)) No. 2 of 2025 Ronny Thounaojam
…Applicant/s Vrs. Baby Girija Thounaojam & Anr
…Respondent/s
-B E F O R E- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
13.10.2025
Heard Mr. P. Tamphamani, learned counsel appearing for the applicant; and Mr. H. Chandrakumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. The present application has been filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condoning the delay of 112 days in preferring the connected revision petition seeking for setting aside the order dated 11.12.2024 passed by the Ld. Family Court, Lamphelpat, Manipur in Cril. (Maintenance) Case No. 2 of 2024. I have heard the submission advanced by the learned counsel appearing for the applicants and also perused the explanation given by the applicant in the present application more particularly para 5.1 up to para 6 of the present application and I am satisfied that the reason given for the delay is reasonable. LUCY GURU MAYU M Digitally signed by LUCY GURUMAYUM Date: 2025.10.14 13:20:52 +05'30'
Page 2
Mr. H. Chandrakumar also fairly submitted that he has no objection in allowing this condonation application. In view of the submission made above, and for the reason given herein above, the present application is allowed by condoning the delay of 112 days in preferring the connected revision petition. The present application stands disposed of.
JUDGE Lucy