Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28437 (ALL)

VIJAY PAL v. MANAGING DIRECTOR UTTAR PRADESH JAL NIGAM URBAN 6 RANA PARATAP MARG LUCKNOW AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/3063/2025 · 2025-03-19

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:40235 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3063 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijay Pal Respondent :- Managing Director Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam Urban 6 Rana Paratap Marg Lucknow And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Subodh Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- Pratik J. Nagar,Siddharth Singhal,Suresh Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1.Heard Sri Subodh Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Suresh Singh for respondent nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Pratik J. Nagar, for the respondent no.4. 2. Petitioner has retired on 30.11.2024, however, he is constrained to approach this Court since respondent employer has not paid his retiral benefits. 3. Learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 3 fairly submits that Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam has financial constraint and it may be a reason that claim of the petitioner is not being completely satisfied and he assured that within a short period, grievance of the petitioner will be adequately addressed. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.4 submits that amount due to the petitioner towards Group Insurance has been transferred to the respondent nos.1 to 3. 5. In the aforesaid circumstances, considering the fair statement by the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 3, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that grievance of the petitioner will be considered and his post retiral benefits will be given within a short period. So far as amount of G.I.S. is concerned that shall be paid to the petitioner preferably within a period of four weeks. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 SB Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad