MANGAL SOREN v. URANIUM CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR
WPC/6136/2018 · 2025-06-11
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28433 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28433 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:15172
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S) No. 6136 of 2018
Mangal Soren s/o Late Mirja Soren, aged about 45 years, at present r/o Qr. No. Type-1/2/08, UCIL Colony, P.O. P.S. Jadugoda, Dist. East Singhbhum -832102.
... … Petitioner(s)
Versus 1 Uranium Corporation of India Limited, P.O. P.S. Jadugoda, Dist. East Singhbhum, Jharkhand - 832102 through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director.
2. The Chairman-cum-Managing Director-cum-Appellate Authority, Uranium Corporation of India Limited, P.O. P.S. Jadugoda, Dist. East Singhbhum, Jharkhand-832102.
3. Executive Director (Projects North), Uranium Corporation of India Limited, P.O. P.S. Jadugoda, Dist. East Singhbhum, Jharkhand -832102
4. General Manager (Personnel) IRS, Uranium Corporation of India Limited. P.O. P.S. Jadugoda, Dist. East Singhbhum, Jharkhand-832102.
… … Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s)
: Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate
Ms. Rishi Bharati, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudarshan Srivastava, Advocate
-------- 10/Dated: 11th June 2025
After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application in order to approach the appellate authority.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that even the appellate authority has dismissed the appeal of the petitioner but in the given facts and circumstances of the case, this Court may direct the appellate authority to re-visit with the order, looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents does not oppose the prayer for withdrawal of the writ application and for again approaching the appellate authority.
4. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by giving liberty to the
2025:JHHC:15172
2
petitioner to approach the appellate authority, if so advised. If the petitioner approaches the appellate authority, it shall re-visit with its order without being prejudiced to the order already passed by it, in accordance with applicable rules and regulation and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case. It goes without saying that this Court has not given any finding on the impugned order at all.
5. Pending I.As, if any, also stand disposed of.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit