Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28432 (JHR)

RAJJAK ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9907/2024 · 2025-02-11

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9907 of 2024 ------ Rajjak Ansari, aged about 23 years, son of Azad Ansari, Resident of village Mohanpur, P.O. and P.S. Sundarpahari, District Godda, Jharkhand … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : M/s. Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : M/s. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P. ----- 02/11.02.2025 Heard the parties 2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Special (POCSO) Case No. 73 of 2024 arising out of Godda (M) P.S. Case No. 137 of 2024, for the offences registered under Sections 366, 420, 376, 323, 504, 506 and 34 of the I.P.C., pending in the Court of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-I-cum-Special Judge (POCSO) Godda. 3. On the promise of marriage, the petitioner is alleged to have enticed away the prosecutrix to leave her father’s house. The petitioner took her to his house and established forceful physical relationship with her and thereafter, he refused to marry her. It is also alleged that the petitioner used to assault her when she declined to have sex with him. 4. Ms. Anuradha Sahay, learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner used to assault the prosecutrix when she refused to establish physical relationship with him. 6. In view of the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected at this stage. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Nandini/- Uploaded