SAFAKAT ALI ALIAS SAFAKAT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./519/2025 · 2025-02-27
Rajesh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2843 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2843 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.519 of 2025 ---- Safakat Ali @ Safakat, aged about 34 years, Son of Makbul Ansari, resident of Village Tubodala, P.O. & P.S Naryanpur, District-Jamtara
…. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus
The State of Jharkhand
…. …. Opposite Party ----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ----
For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
: Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Adv.
For the State
: Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P.
----
04/Dated: 27th February, 2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.
2. The applicant, who is in custody since 30.06.2024, has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail in connection with S.T Case No.110 of 2024, arising out of Naryanpur P.S. Case No.71 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 399, 402 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code & Sections 25(1-B)A/25(6)/26/35 of the Arms Act, pending in the court of learned Principal Sessions Judge, Jamtara.
3. The prayer for bail of the applicant was earlier rejected by this Court vide
order dated 23.10.2024 passed in B.A No.9116 of 2024.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the charge has already been framed against this applicant on 13.09.2024. Some of the witnesses have already been examined. Further, the applicant has no criminal antecedent. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been renewed.
5.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Jamtara in connection with S.T Case No.110 of 2024, arising out of Naryanpur P.S. Case No.71 of 2024, on the condition that the applicant(s) will submit self-attested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned court below which
he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court. Further condition is that one of the bailors will be the father of the applicant(s) and the applicant is directed to report once in a month before the concerned police station, till conclusion of the trial.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Raja/- Uploaded
2. B.A No.519 of 2025