Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2843 (AP)

Smt. P.Prameelamma, v. Sri Krishnadevaraya University,

WP/4952/2003 · 2025-10-08

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010008582003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 4952/2003 Between: 1. SMT. P.PRAMEELAMMA,, W/O.T.SURYAPRAKASH RAO, WORKING AS LIBBRARY TECH. ASST. SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY, ANANTHAPUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI KRISHNADEVARAYA UNIVERSITY, Rep. by its Registrar, Sri Venkateswarapuram, Ananthapur. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent authority in not regularising the services of the petitioner in the post of Library Technical Assistant on part with one Mr.G.Gangadharaiah, who is far junior to the petitioner with effect from the date on which the services of the junior to the petitioner were regularised i.e., 1-5-2001 and also not granting scale on par with junior Mr.G.Gangadharaiah w.e.f 25.6.1999 with usual increments as highly arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequentially to direct the Respondent to regularise the services of the petitioner on par with his junior Mr.G.Gangadharaiah with all consequential benefits and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 6525 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue an interim direction directing the respondent to consider the case of the petitioner for regularisation on par with his junior Mr.G.Gangadharaiah keeping win view of the representation filed by the petitioner, dt:3.10.2001 and the consequential representation dt:4.2.2003 pending disposal of the above W.P., and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 12253 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 2 OF 2004(WPMP 31653 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to post the writ petition for final hearing to take it up on out of turn Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V RAMANA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. O UDAYA KUMAR SC For S K UNIVERSITY The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 4952/2003 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner also filed W.P.No.261 of 2020 seeking consideration of her services from the period 01.03.1989 to 27.09.2007 for pension, notional fixation, increments, and retirement benefits under Rules 13 and 14 of the Revised Pension Rules, 1989 and the said writ petition was disposed of on 12.02.2025. In view of the same, there remains nothing for adjudication in this matter and has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 09th October, 2025 RKS