Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35695-DB
Court No. - 42 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4599 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vikash Seth Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Atul Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
1. Heard Sri Atul Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Jyoti, learned counsel for the informant.
2. Learned counsel for the informant raised an objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that it has been filed with the concealment of material facts. It was submitted that the petitioner had already instituted an application for anticipatory bail before the court below, which was rejected by
order dated 05-03-2025. However, the petitioner failed to disclose this fact, making the writ petition liable to be dismissed with exemplary costs, as both proceedings cannot run simultaneously. Therefore, the instant writ petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of concealment of facts.
3. Confronted with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed, with liberty to file an anticipatory bail application before the Hon'ble High Court.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid leave.
Order Date :- 11.3.2025 pks (Prashant Kumar, J.) (M.C. Tripathi, J.) Digitally signed by :- PANKAJ KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad