1 2025:CGHC:41393 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1704 of 2023 Manohar Daharwal S/o. Shri Chandulal Daharwal, Aged About 55 Years R/o. Harduli Sewni Madhya Pradesh, Pin Code - 480880 ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Superintendent Of Police, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Station House Officer, Police Mandir Hasaud, Pin Code - 492101 District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Ajay Kumar Kharadkar, S/o. Late Ramakant Kharadkar, Aged About 58 Years R/o. Bhagwat Wade Jiwaji Ganj, Pgv College Laxar, Ajaypur Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh. 4 - Aditikharadkar, W/o. Late Ajay Kharadkar, Aged About 57 Years R/o. Bhagwat Wada Jiwaji Ganj, Pgv College Laxar, Ajaypur Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh. 5 - Jitendra Singh Sikwar, S/o. Ghanshyam Singh Shikwar, Aged About 33 Years R/o. Loha Mandi, Kotawalamoholla, Fort Gate, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh. ... Respondents (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Ms. Ritika Verma, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.08.20 10:37:43 +0530 2 Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 18.08.2025 1. The present Cr.M.P. has been filed with the following prayer:- “i) That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash FIR dated 09/05/2023 in the Crime No. 243/2023 registered in MadirHasaud, Raipur (C.G.) and all the consequential proceedings against the Respondent No.3,4 and 5 (Annexure P-1). ii) Any other relief, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be granted.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, who is the complainant in the case submits that because of the misunderstanding and miscommunication, the petitioner/ complainant has lodged an FIR against the respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5. She further submits that the compromise has already arrived at between the parties outside the Court, however, charge-sheet has been filed in the case. 3. Learned counsel for the State opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Having considered the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, that compromise has been arrived at between the parties outside the Court; and charge-sheet has been filed in the present case, the parties are directed to appear before the trial Court concerned and move an appropriate application on the basis of compromise entered between the parties, which shall be decided by the trial Court expeditiously. 3 5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. SD/- SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Amardeep/Rahul