NAGULAPATI VEERA RAGHAVA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/20903/2025 · 2025-08-31
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28411 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 28411 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010404082025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 20903/2025 Between:
1. NAGULAPATI VEERA RAGHAVA RAO, S/O SUBBARAO, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST, R/O H.NO. 8-91, SEETHAMPETA VILLAGE,KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL ELURU (ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRATARAIT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU (ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT AT ELURU.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, JANGAREDDIGUDEM DIVISION AT JANGAREDDIGUDEM, ELURU (ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU (ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT.
5. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR/DISTRICT GROUND WATER OFFICER, DISTRICT GROUNDWATER OFFICE, GROUND WATER DEPARTMENT, ELURU (ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT AT ELURU.
6. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, ELURU (ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT AT ELURU.
7. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER, APEPDCL, JANGAREDDIGUDEM,
ELURU (ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT.
8. THE ADDITIONAL DIVISIONAL ENGNIEER ADE, APEPDCL, KOYYALAGUDEM, ELURU (ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT.
9. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER AE, APEPDCL(OPERATIONS), BAYYANAGUDEM, KOYYALAGUDEM MANDAL, ELURU (ERSTWHILE WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT.
10. SMT BANDARU RADHIKA, W/O LAXMANARAO, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-2-84, KURRU VARI STREET, JANGAREDDIGUDEM, ELURU (ERSTWHILE
2 WEST GODAVARI) DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an appropriate writ,
order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in permitting the 10 respondent to continue the bore well dug by her in the land admeasuring Ac 7.60 cents in Sy.Nos. 199/1 and 199/4 of Bayyanagudem Revenue Village, Koyyalagudem Mandal, Eluru (Erstwhile West Godavari) District below 100 meters distance from the petitioners bore well which is in existence in his land in an extent of Ac. 9.40 cents covered by Sy.Nos. 199-A-1 and 199-A-2 of the same village, in spite of objections from the petitioner and in attempting to provide electricity service connection to the said bore well of the 10th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of provisions of AP WALTA Act besides unconstitutional and to consequently direct the respondents not to grant any permissions and Electricity Service Connection to operate the said bore well of the 10th respondent and to close the same, in the interest of justice and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to grant any further permissions and not to provide electricity connection to operate the bore well of the 1respondent situated in the land admeasuring Ac 7.60 cents in Sy. Nos. 199/1 & 199/4 of Bayyanagudem Revenue Village, Koyyalagudem Mandal, Eluru (Erstwhile West Godavari) District, pending disposal of the main writ petition in the interest of justice and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.20903 of 2025
ORDER:-
Learned counsel for petitioner sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writ petition. Learned counsel endorsed the same on the bundle.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 01.09.2025 KBN