Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:42622 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3270 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hari Shankar Yadav And 24 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 16 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Omkar Nath Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. By means of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioners wants inclusion of his training period towards qualifying period of 19 years with additional increment while working on the post of Sub- inspector. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy is no more res integra in view of judgment of this Court in the case of Ghanshyam Tiwari v. State of U.P. and Others (Writ A No. 44330 of 2013) decided on 7.9.2012, which has come to affirmed in special appeal, against which Special Leave Petition has also been dismissed. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the matter can be decided in accordance with law provided all the petitioners make their individual representations. In view of above, l dispose of the writ petition with direction to the petitioners to make their separate individual representation before competent authority, namely, respondent no. 2 annexing therewith copy of the judgment in the case of Ghanshyam Tiwari (supra) within a period of four weeks from today and in the event any separate representation is filed by each of the petitioners, the same shall be disposed of by means of reasoned and speaking order within a further period of two months. Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Sanjeev Digitally signed by :- SANJEEV RANJAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad