HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13044/2025 1. Shyam Singh Dhirawat S/o Nanu Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Rajputo Ka Mohalla, Rojda, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Nanag Ram S/o Chhotu Ram Mehara, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 41, Mehra Basti, Rojda, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The District Collector, Jaipur. 4. The Commissioner, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur. 5. The Deputy Commssioner, Zone-12, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur. 6. The Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, Sub- Division Jalsu, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Uttam Kumar Mr. Krishan Kant Panwar For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 29/08/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “The respondents may kindly be directed to initiate immediate action to remove encroachment from the allotted land bearing Khasra No. 72 situated at Gram Panchayat Rojda, Panchayat Samiti Jalsu, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur which is (2 of 3) [CW-13044/2025] illegally encroached and trespassed by the encroacher by constructing pucca constructions. Ii) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case also be passed in favour of humble petitioners along with cost of the writ petition.” 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that 50,000 square meters land has been allotted by the JDA for construction of the sports stadium at Gram Panchayat Rojda. Counsel submits that certain encroachments have been made upon the aforesaid land for which several correspondences have been done between the authorities for removal of the same in the year 2024-2025 but inspite of passing of considerable time, till date, no action has been taken for removal of the unauthorized construction over the land in question, hence under these circumstances, interference of this Court is warranted. 3. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. 4. Considering the arguments put-forth by counsel for the petitioner and looking to the fact that several correspondence has been made between the respondents for removal of the encroachment from the subject land, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the authorities concerned by way of submitting a representation within a period of seven days from today. It is expected from the respondent authorities to act in accordance with law by deciding the representation submitted by the petitioner by passing a reasoned and speaking order, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all the respective parties (3 of 3) [CW-13044/2025] expeditiously as early as possible preferable within a period of six weeks thereafter. 5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/50