- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:816 WP No. 6334 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 6334 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI KIDAMBI RAMANUJACHARI, S/O KIDAMBI VIJAYARAGHAVA CHARI, AGED 51 YEARS, R/AT 313, ADMIRALTY MANOR, 13TH CROSS, 6TH MAIN, INDIRA NAGAR, 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 038. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VIGNESH.V., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. RBL BANK LTD., REGISTERED OFFICE AT 1ST LANE, SHAHUPURI, KOLHAPUR - 416 001. MAHARASHTRA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL NODAL OFFICER. 2. STATE BANK OF INDIA, REGISTERED OFFICE AT STATE BANK BHAWAN, MADAM CAMA ROAD, MUMBAI - 400 021. REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGER. 3. THE BANKING OMBUDSMAN, BENGALURU, C/O RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, 10/3/8, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:816 WP No. 6334 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 07.01.2025, on that day, when the matter is called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner it was ordered to be listed on 09.01.2025. The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel of the petitioner. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2