[2025:RJ-JP:36831-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 309/2025 Ankit Jogi Son Of Shri Manish Jogi, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Purana Bagrana, Shankar Vatika, Mali Ki Kothi, Bagrana, P.o. Kanota, District Jaipur 303012, At Present R/o Karoli Road, Ganga Ji Ki Kothi, Gopal Vatika, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. Superintendent Of Police, Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 4. S.h.o. Police Station Kotwali, Gangapur City, Distt. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) 5. S.h.o. Police Station Kanota, District Jaipur (Raj.) 6. Jagdish Meena Son Of Shri Namalum, Resident Of Near Ramsinghpura Railway Station, Burthal, District Jaipur- 303012 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vishnu Bohra, Adv. For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar Mr. Himmat Singh, CI, SHO Kanota, Distt. Jaipur Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rahul Sharma, Adv. Mr. Utkarsh Goyal, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 11/09/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:36831-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-309/2025] This habeas corpus petition has been filed by the petitioner with regard to illegal detention of the corpus who is above 18 years of age. Today, the concerned Govt. Advocate submitted the status report as well as the case diary. We have perused the case diary and the police has recorded the statement of the corpus in which she has stated that she is not under any illegal detention and she is residing with her parents. In that view of the matter, considering the status report as well as the statement of corpus, we are of the considered view that the corpus is not under any illegal detention by anyone and she is peacefully residing with her parents and no interference is required by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Hence, this habeas corpus petition stands dismissed. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J JYOTI /91