Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28399 (DEL)

M/S SUKMANI ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES & ANR.

W.P.(C)/12989/2025 · 2025-08-26

Prathiba M Singh, Shail Jain

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12989/2025 & CM APPL. 53174/2025 M/S SUKMANI ENTERPRISES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arif Ahmed Khan, Ms. Shaziya Fahim, Mr. Afroz Ahmad Khan and Mr. Manoj Awasthi, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF TRADE AND TAXES & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sumit K. Batra, Adv. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN O R D E R % 26.08.2025 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The Petitioner by the present petition seeks refund of a sum of Rs. 6,47,538/- for the period 1st Quarter of 2017-18 in terms of Section 38(3) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. 3. According to the Petitioner all the documents have been submitted on 30th July, 2022 and the refund has not been granted. 4. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent submits that the DVAT 21 form has not been filed. 5. Be that as it may, considering the facts of the case let the application for refund be processed and a proper order, in accordance with law, be passed within three months. All rights and remedies are left open. 6. The petition is disposed of in these terms. Pending applications, if any, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2025 at 12:53:55 are also disposed of. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. SHAIL JAIN, J. AUGUST 26, 2025 dj/msh This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2025 at 12:53:55