APHC010404772018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18837/2018 Between: 1. MALAPATI GURUKRISHNA VARA PRASAD,, MALAPATI GURUKRISHNA VARA PRASAD, S/O MALAPATI VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O KAKANI VILLAGE, NARSARAOPET MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. GUNTUR ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF AP, .REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE BUILDING, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT GUNTUR 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR. 3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, NARSARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NARSARAOPET RURAL POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. KORNEPATI MADHU, S/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC- REAL ESTATE BROKER, R/O KAKANI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. KOLLURI SIVAIAH, S/O SRIRAMULU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC- REAL ESTATE BROKER, R/O KAKANI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in not registering crime against 5th and 6th respondents basing on the report dt.16.05.2018 lodged by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and contrary to the judgment of Honble Supreme Court in Lalitha Kumari Vs Govt of U.P. and others and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in not registering crime against 5th and 6th respondents basing on the report dt.16.05.2018 lodged by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and contrary to the judgment of Honble Supreme Court in Lalitha Kumari Vs Govt of U.P. and others and pass ....” 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondents on instructions would submit that the complaint filed by the Petitioner was referred as „Civil in Nature‟ 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 24996 of 2018 15.07.2025 Mjl /*