Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 28396 (KAR)

VENKATARAMANAPPA v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/17915/2024 · 2025-06-11

M Nagaprasanna

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20065 WP No. 17915 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 17915 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: VENKATARAMANAPPA S/O LATE CHEETHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS RESIDING AT LALBAGH DASRAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK - 562 114, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A.G. BOPAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE BHAVAN, 1ST FLOOR, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK - 561 203, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALLAPURA SUB DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK - 561 203, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, HOSKOTE TALUK, HOSKOTE - 562 114, Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20065 WP No. 17915 of 2024 BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. 4. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS HOSKOTE TALUK, HOSKOTE - 562 114, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. 5. SMT. MUNIYAMMA, W/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, 6. SRI. ANJINAPPA, S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, 7. SRI. MANJUNATH S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.5 TO 7 ARE THE RESIDENTS OF GOTTIPURA VILLAGE, JADIGENAHALLI HOBLI, HOSKOTE TALUK - 562 114, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. 8. SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA, D/O LATE MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDENT OF WARD NO. 89, JOGUPALYA, LINGANAPALYA, IIIRD CROSS, SHANTHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NEELAKANTAPPA PUJAR, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20065 WP No. 17915 of 2024 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 20.04.2024 VIDE ANNX-G PASSED IN I.A. NO.1 IN O.S.NO. 199/2023 BY THE 2ND ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AT HOSKOTE BY ALLOWING IA NO.1 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE TRIAL COURT AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL The undersigned most respectfully submits as follows:- 1. That the petitioner has filed the above Writ petition before this Hon'ble court challenging the legality of order of dismissal of IA No.1. dtd.20.04.2024, passed by the 2nd Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Hoskote. 2. I state that the order of trial court has to be challenged by filing the Misc. Appeal before the principal Senior civil Judge, Hoskote Bangalore rural district and therefore, the Writ Petition is not maintainable. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20065 WP No. 17915 of 2024 Wherefore, in view of the above, the writ petition is kindly be dismissed as withdraw, in the interest of justice and equity." In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE JY List No.: 2 Sl No.: 16 CT: BHK